-

PILGRIM'S CORNER - Documenting America. Scroll down for Table of Content.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

More images of 9/11

Dramatic images of World Trade Centre collapse on 9/11 released for first time

By Philip Delves Broughton
Last updated at 10:41 PM on 10th February 2010

We have seen the Twin Towers collapse hundreds of times on TV. The steel and glass skyscrapers exploding like a bag of flour, the dust and smoke pluming out across Manhattan. But never like this, from above.

Nine years after the defining moment of the 21st century, a stunning set of photographs taken by New York Police helicopters forces us to look afresh at a catastrophe we assumed we knew so well.

You know but cannot see the 2,752 men, women and children who died at the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001. None is visible here.

World Trade Center in New York

Terror: A tidal wave of dust and debris roars through lower Manhattan as the World Trade Centre collapses on September 11, 2001

In this Sept. 11, 2001 photo made by the New York City Police Department and provided by ABC News

Collapse: This image captures the sheer size of the debris cloud enveloping buildings and cars as the towers collapse

In this Sept. 11, 2001

The cloud spreads out, consuming the surrounding area and moving out over the East River

SO WHY ARE WE SEEING THEM NOW?

After 9/11 the U.S.'s National Institute of Standards and Technology collected images from amateur, professional and freelance photographers as part of its investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Centre. It completed its research in 2005. In the summer of last year, ABC saw that NIST was asking the photographers' permission to release the images and filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act to get access to them. The images seen here are ones taken by NYPD helicopters and come from the 2,779 pictures supplied on nine CDs to the news organisation.

All we see is the spectacular moment of collapse, what film directors call the wide shot, showing the towers in their urban setting, before, during and after their fall.

Even for those who were there, like me, running from the cloud and choking in the dust, it is hard to believe. But what is all too evident to everyone is that this event changed the world, with consequences that will haunt us for decades.

With the Twin Towers collapsed the world we thought we knew.

These dramatic images were taken by police photographers in helicopters and it is the first time they have been seen, having been released under a Freedom of Information request made by America's ABC News.

Burning buildings can be seen crumpling in on themselves as plumes of smoke rise up over the New York skyline that terrible September morning.

The images show how the police helicopter first began taking images from afar before moving in to reveal the devastation taking place underneath.

They also reveal the horror faced by those trapped in the burning buildings and then the walls of smoke and debris that enveloped the surrounding area as the towers came crashing down.

Released more than eight years after the deaths of 2,752 people on that day, they are powerful reminders of the attack that led to wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The legacy of the New York attack continues today with as British forces joining with Afghan soldiers and Nato to launch the biggest attack on the Taliban - accused of harbouring Al Qaeda who organised the 9/11 attack - since the initial 2001 offensive.

Meanwhile, in New York, work is continuing to build on the rubble of what became known as Ground Zero.

Structural steel for the 1,776ft tower, which will be known as 1 World Trade Centre, has already reached 200ft above street level.

Workers are now installing 16 steel nodes on the 20th-floor of the tower which will serve as joints between the steel framing for the building's podium and the steel for the rest of the tower. The 104-storey skyscraper is due to be completed in 2013 and will be one of the tallest buildings in the U.S.

The moment one of the World Trade Centre towers begins to crumble in New York

The moment one of the World Trade Centre towers begins to crumble in New York

In this Sept. 11, 2001

Target: Smoke fills the surrounding area as the South Tower collapses after the terrorist attack by Al Qaeda

In this Sept. 11, 2001
In this Sept. 11, 2001

At first the police helicopter is far away before it moves through the smoke to show the flames pouring out of the ravaged North Tower


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1249885/New-World-Trade-Center-9-11-aerial-images-ABC-News.html#ixzz0fBtrOrnW

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Election 2008: Presidential Race State-by-State Snapshot

Election 2008: Presidential Race State-by-State Snapshot

The table below contains results of the most recent general election poll conducted in each state. The see the related article for each poll click on the state name.

McCain Vs. Obama

Rasmussen Markets

Alabama

Republican

60%


Democrat

39%


Alaska

Republican

55%


Democrat

40%


Arizona

Republican

59%


Democrat

38%


Arkansas

Republican

51%


Democrat

42%


California

Republican

40%


Democrat

56%


Colorado

Republican

45%


Democrat

52%


Connecticut

Republican

39%


Democrat

56%


Delaware

Republican

41%


Democrat

56%


Florida

Republican

46%


Democrat

51%


Georgia

Republican

54%


Democrat

45%


Hawaii

Republican

27%


Democrat

68%


Idaho

Republican

68%


Democrat

29%


Illinois

Republican

39%


Democrat

56%


Indiana

Republican

50%


Democrat

43%


Iowa

Republican

43%


Democrat

51%


Kansas

Republican

54%


Democrat

41%


Kentucky

Republican

52%


Democrat

42%


Louisiana

Republican

55%


Democrat

40%


Maine

Republican

46%


Democrat

51%


Maryland

Republican

37%


Democrat

60%


Massachusetts

Republican

34%


Democrat

62%


Michigan

Republican

40%


Democrat

56%


Minnesota

Republican

45%


Democrat

52%


Missouri

Republican

46%


Democrat

52%


Mississippi

Republican

52%


Democrat

44%


Montana

Republican

52%


Democrat

44%


Nebraska

Republican

56%


Democrat

37%


Nevada

Republican

45%


Democrat

50%


New Hampshire

Republican

43%


Democrat

53%


New Jersey

Republican

42%


Democrat

50%


New Mexico

Republican

42%


Democrat

55%


New York

Republican

37%


Democrat

57%


North Carolina

Republican

48%


Democrat

48%


North Dakota

Republican

55%


Democrat

41%


Ohio

Republican

49%


Democrat

49%


Oregon

Republican

41%


Democrat

54%


Pennsylvania

Republican

41%


Democrat

54%


South Carolina

Republican

51%


Democrat

45%


South Dakota

Republican

54%


Democrat

37%


Tennessee

Republican

58%


Democrat

39%


Texas

Republican

52%


Democrat

43%


Utah

Republican

64%


Democrat

32%


Virginia

Republican

47%


Democrat

50%


Washington

Republican

43%


Democrat

53%


West Virginia

Republican

50%


Democrat

42%


Wisconsin

Republican

44%


Democrat

54%


Wyoming

Republican

58%


Democrat

39%


Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Julliet-Marquette expedition - map and article in brief

Leaders & Success

Louis Jolliet, The Mississippi River King

Louis Jolliet never had it easy.

Then again, he never expected anything to come easy in his tough life.

Jolliet's father was dead by the time Louis turned 6.

His mother remarried, and Jolliet attended a Jesuit seminary in the primitive settlements of New France, which later became the province of Quebec in Canada.

Realizing his talent in hunting and music, Jolliet (1645-1700) gave up plans for the priesthood, leaving the Jesuits to become a fur trader.

It was 1667. The rugged landscape and harsh climate of Jolliet's youth forced him to hone his skills as a trapper and trader.

He would achieve fame as one of the first two white men to traverse the Mississippi River, along with Jacques Marquette, a Catholic priest and missionary who sought to convert Indians to Christianity.

Jolliet was the first major explorer of European descent who was born in North America.

By the 1670s, the governor Comte de Frontenac of New France needed to confirm the Mississippi River's exact boundaries. No one knew if it flowed westward toward the Sea of California and on to China, or southward into Spanish territory and the Gulf of Mexico. This was a crucial geographic detail for French colonists and traders.

French settlers didn't even know the best passageway to reach the Great Water, the river's name then.

Jolliet had a strong background for the mission. When he got the assignment, he was a tough 27-year-old who knew native languages from growing up in French-Indian settlements in Quebec.

The Long Way

The Jolliet-Marquette expedition entailed a harrowing, 2,900-mile trip in birch bark canoes. The party made its way from the current U.S.-Canada border down to the mouth of the Arkansas River and back again. The adventure led through tangled regions of wilderness where only Indian tribes lived.

Jolliet and Marquette made a good team. Clad in his buckskins and fur hat, Jolliet provided the hunting and navigation skills. Marquette helped out by creating trust among Indians who respected the "Black Robes" of the priesthood.

In the winter of 1672-73, the explorers set up a staging ground on the current site of St. Ignace on Michigan's Upper Peninsula. They stayed at a Jesuit mission post near the confluence of the Great Lakes and other waterways that were the main modes of transportation.

The expedition spent a frigid winter there preparing maps and supplies of Indian corn and smoked meat for the trip. The men also gathered beads, needles and hatchets to bring along as gifts for Indians.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

The Pilgrims: Faith in the Face of Skepticism

The Pilgrims: Faith in the Face of Skepticism | Print | E-mail
Written by Joe Wolverton, II
Monday, 23 November 2009 00:00

PilgrimsBetsy Ross didn’t sew the first flag. Jesus wasn’t really born on December 25. Columbus didn’t discover America. We hear these statements all the time, for we live in an era where the foundational stories that define our national identity and bind us together as a people are being constantly deconstructed. We are told that the heroic stories of the founding of Christianity and the founding of our great republic are mere myths, factually inaccurate, and no more important or meaningful than the fanciful fairy tales told to amuse children.

We live in a skeptical age. Even the most optimistic and far-sighted among us must at times trudge blindly through a disorienting swirl of attacks on our faith, our families, and our country. While there is no sure tonic to ease the nauseous vertigo that often accompanies this struggle, there is a salve to be found in the tales we have been taught and in the truth and moral enrichment to be found therein. Whether for our own retrenchment or for that of our children, we can, we must, turn again to the record of our noble and brave ancestors to remind ourselves of the otherwise insurmountable odds they overcame to bequeath us with such a rich legacy of liberty. One of the most impressive stories from our history is that of the small band of brethren who fled their homes seeking a place where they could worship freely. This courageous congregation is known as the Pilgrims.

Poor Wayfaring Strangers
The congregation of pious Christians known to history as Pilgrims was in their own time called Separatists for their schism with the greater Church of England. Dissension from the Church of England was illegal during the reign of King James the First, and the King was determined to brook no effrontery to his royal highness. He would sooner purge his country of disloyal subjects than allow those subjects to effect a purge of the state religion of which the king was the titular head. To enforce his egotistical and tyrannical will, James sent agents far and wide into the country to round up those Separatists reportedly meeting in secret in small groups to avoid detection by the king’s sycophantic spies.

Fearing imprisonment or worse at the hands of the royal agents, 400 English Separatists fled their beloved England. They sailed surreptitiously to Holland (leaving England without permission was a crime), where the atmosphere was more accommodating to those given to alternative (read: unofficial) interpretations of the word of God. The Dutch were historically more tolerant of religious dissidents and would permit, within limits, pilgrims of many religious creeds to assemble without fear of reprisal or persecution.

Although the Pilgrims found a welcoming harbor in Holland, it proved to be a brief respite, as political situations altered as crucial peace treaties with Spain and France expired, leaving Holland politically unallied and therefore exposed to the avarice of other less-progressive states. As the climate in Holland became decreasingly hospitable, the Pilgrims met to formulate a new plan and consider the options open to them. It was decided that, despite the possible implications, they would return to England, and they immediately set about acquiring investors to fund their ultimate journey: to America. The Pilgrim pastors believed unwaveringly that God’s will was manifest in their wanderings and privations, just as it had been with the Children of Israel in Egypt. After 40 years, the Israelites crossed over the Jordan and entered into the Holy Land, a land promised to them by their God and his prophets. Like the chosen people of the Old Testament, the Pilgrims had faith that they would be led to a land of milk and honey on the western shore of their own River Jordan — the Atlantic Ocean.

Plymouth Rock
The Pilgrims passed through trials of turbulent seas, uncharted courses, scurvy, and vile sickness that decimated their already small community, as well as intrigue, treason, and treachery. As a reward God delivered His faithful flock to the promised land, a land where they would at last be absolutely free from religious persecution and would live under laws framed and executed fairly and justly.

Upon reaching the shores of their new home, the Pilgrims dropped to their knees with an outpouring of gratitude toward the Almighty. Rising from their knees, the Pilgrims would have noticed an enormous rock. Yes, Plymouth Rock. We’ll never know whether or not any of our Pilgrim Fathers stepped foot on it or climbed over it before going farther inland. What is known is that this small band of believers, bound together by sacred covenant and civil compact, overcame insuperable odds that would scuttle most other, less devout and determined settlers. These Pilgrims, for so they were, were a stout albeit peripatetic lot that had nowhere left to go and therefore carved, literally, a new home, a New England, for themselves. Separated by thousands of miles from the religious intolerance and oppression of King James, these Separatists were now free to worship as they chose. The Pilgrims, looking up at a rock that history would call Plymouth Rock in their honor, recalled that their Lord commanded them to build upon such a strong immovable foundation, and thus they were wanderers no more.

Mayflower Compact
Before being allowed to debark, the leaders of the Pilgrim colony required all male members to enter into an agreement setting out the metes and bounds of rights and responsibilities in the new world. Normally, these sorts of issues would be predetermined within the patent granted by the crown. In the Pilgrims’ case, however, they had dropped anchor in a land outside the region assigned them in the patent. They were essentially operating outside of the law, so they needed new guidelines to direct both the Pilgrims and the others who accompanied them to America (over half of the passengers on board the Mayflower were not Pilgrims). Before leaving Holland, one of the Pilgrims’ pastors who was to stay behind and prepare the second wave of travelers, John Robinson, instructed his followers to form a secular civil government, so to begin the colony in the manner in which they intended to go on, that is to say, in an orderly and tolerant fashion. As he rightly reckoned, making a secular compact with the nonbelievers demonstrated good faith and sound reason on the part of those whom many believe to be overzealous religious reactionaries.

The document signed by 41 of the 50 male adults on board the Mayflower (the other nine were either too ill or were headed straight back to England) has been described as an example of “crystalline brevity.” The text is worthy of repetition in its entirety.

We whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread sovereign Lord, King James, by the grace of God, of Great Britain, France and Ireland king, defender of the faith, ect., having undertaken, for the Glory of God and advancement of the Christian Faith and Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the First Colony in the Northern Parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God and one of another, Covenant and Combine ourselves together into a Civil Body Politic, for our better ordering and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute and frame such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions and Offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the Colony, unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness whereof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France and Ireland the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth. Anno Domini 1620.

Although in many ways unremarkable and certainly not revolutionary, this brief contract is one of our republic’s foundational documents and was an example of Puritan pragmatism. These men and women, faced with a silent coast with nothing to anticipate but hardship and fresh despair, bound themselves together into a community of far-flung Englishmen committed to prospering and preserving their natural-born right of self-determination.

The First Thanksgiving
Now for the part of the story familiar to second graders with paper belted hats and multi-colored feather headbands and all those who have attended the annual plays acted out in gyms and cultural halls throughout the country. The Pilgrims had much to be thankful for and they knew it. The steadying Hand of Providence led them safely across the ocean, and they had been blessed with strength to build houses and common buildings (the first was erected on Christmas Day, 1620). Next, they had to plant crops so that they might fulfill the measure of their divine commission and perpetuate their colony here in the New Canaan. This forested land with abundant flora and fauna was promised, indeed, but the soil was strange and successful horticulture was a conundrum. Enter the Indians.

It is true, as we all remember from lessons that were once taught in school, that the Pilgrims and the Indians sat down together and partook of the fruits of their labors, ate turkey and venison, and benefited from mutual instruction and genuine fellowship. This assembly was remarkable for many reasons; chief among them, perhaps, was the sensational account of Indian atrocities told to the Pilgrims while they tarried in Holland. The Indians, they were told, “delight to torment men in the most bloody manner that may be; flaying some alive with the shells of fishes, cutting off the members and joints of others by piecemeal and broiling on the coals.” With this image seared into the front of their minds, as soon as they arrived in America the Pilgrims were quick to erect barricades and post sentries to protect them from the natives they believed to be bloodthirsty savages.

In truth, in the beginning the Pilgrims and Indians did clash, sometimes violently. The fault, however, was never one-sided and the peace was always quickly restored. By the time of the harvest of 1621, several peaceful months had passed since the Pilgrims had any scrapes with the native inhabitants of the land, and they were feeling safe and secure and had redirected their minds and efforts toward harvesting their crops and building all the necessary infrastructure to support the thriving colony they designed and were determined to establish.

It was in this atmosphere of progress, peace, and planned prosperity that made possible one of the momentous greetings in American history. One Friday afternoon, a Pokanoket Indian calling himself Samoset walked up to a Pilgrim and announced, “Welcome, Englishmen!” Hardly the senseless savagery described in such vivid, gory detail by teachers in Dutch schools. As a matter of fact, the Indians genuinely welcomed the newcomers and demonstrated their goodwill by teaching the eager though ignorant European farmers a little something about American -agriculture.

Samoset taught the Pilgrims that because of the unique chemical composition of the local Massachusetts soil, it was essential that the ground be fertilized to balance the soil and make it more nourishing to the corn and other crops planted by the Pilgrims. The fertilizer preferred by the Indians after years of experimenting was dead herring. The Pilgrims trusted the advice of Samoset, and the autumn of 1621 saw a bumper crop of corn, squash, beans, barley, and peas. It was a harvest worthy of giving thanks — thanks to God and thanks to the Indians who shared valuable information.

The precise date was not recorded, but sometime in late October or early November, about 100 Indians walked into the Pilgrim settlement (now occupied by several common buildings and log homes) carrying deer hunted specially for this harvest feast. The Pilgrims, about 50 in number, provided turkey (turkey from the New World was being eaten in England for about 40 years and was already a staple of English Christmas dinner), other fowl, deer, and beer. The meat was cooked on spits over open fires. The weather that season was crisp, but not cold, and the Pilgrims no doubt were fascinated by the bright fall foliage, a palette of colors not seen in England because of the perpetual dampness and lack of sunlight.

The congregation, Indians and Pilgrims, sat down in small groups on the ground and around small round tables and ate their dinner. The scene would not seem so foreign to us, their descendants, except for the fact that there were no forks (not in use in Massachusetts for another 70 years), no cranberry sauce, and no pumpkin pie. The food that was eaten was washed down with beer, the beverage of choice for saint and sinner in England because of the notoriously contaminated water available throughout the country. Thankfully, the bountiful barley crop in their new home made brewing easy.

Lessons Our Fathers Learned
As the foregoing demonstrates, there is much truth in the stories we have been taught regarding our Pilgrim Fathers and the First Thanksgiving they celebrated with the Indians that shared that small plot of earth with them. The fact that the Pilgrims succeeded where so many other erstwhile colonists had failed was due in large measure to the kindness, generosity, and trust shown to the Pilgrims by Massasoit and his small tribe. These men and women, believed to be savages but proven to be “very trustworthy, quick with apprehension, ripe witted, and just,” reached out to their neighbors and extended a hand of fellowship. So often, this hand was slapped away by frightened Europeans. The Pilgrims, themselves frequent victims of treachery and sabotage, took the hand of the Indians and shook it. They sat together, ate together, and grew together.

Even in light of the timely and invaluable aid proffered by the Indians, more than any other consideration it was the tireless and firm faith of our Pilgrim Fathers that kept them alive and animated their steadfast resolve to bloom where the Hand of the Almighty God had planted them, no matter how rocky, unknown, and hostile the soil.